Tenth Circuit· 11/19/1984
Amoco Oil Co. v. Rainbow Snow
Citations
- 748 F.2d 556
- 224 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 128
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 16628
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the likelihood-of-confusion determination should account “not only” for “confusion of source, but also . . . confusion that results from a mistaken belief in common sponsorship or affiliation”
- considering erroneous the district court’s failure to consider “the context of confusion that results from a mistaken belief in common sponsorship or affiliation” in analyzing a claim brought under 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seth, Barrett, Seymour
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. Lens.Com, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2013-07-16· cited 156×
- Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. Hogg Wyld, Ltd., Susan Duran, Marsha Stafford and Oink, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1987-09-14· cited 119×
- Payless Shoesource, Inc. v. Reebok International Limited and Reebok International Ltd.Federal Circuit· 1993-07-20· cited 93×
- King of the Mountain Sports, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.Tenth Circuit· 1999-07-08· cited 92×
- Gte Corporation v. David R. Williams, D/B/A General TelephoneTenth Circuit· 1990-07-09· cited 42×
- Team Tires Plus, Ltd. v. Tires Plus, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2005-01-06· cited 36×
- John Allan Co. v. Craig Allen Co. LLCTenth Circuit· 2008-08-28· cited 32×
- Amoco Oil Company v. Rainbow Snow, Inc. And Scott G. Van LeeuwanTenth Circuit· 1987-01-20· cited 26×
- Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. Hogg Wyld, Ltd.D. New Mexico· 1985-08-01· cited 22×
- Greenway Nutrients, Inc. v. BlackburnD. Colorado· 2014-03-26· cited 22×
- United States Surgical Corp. v. Orris, Inc.D. Kansas· 1998-06-19· cited 21×
- Derma Pen, LLC v. 4EverYoung Ltd.Tenth Circuit· 2014-12-09· cited 20×
- Paramount Pictures v. Video Broadcasting SystemsD. Kansas· 1989-10-11· cited 17×
- Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. v. Nutro Products, Inc.D. Kansas· 2003-03-25· cited 16×
- Adams by and Through Adams v. BakerD. Kansas· 1996-02-02· cited 15×
- Hartford House Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards Inc.D. Colorado· 1986-11-20· cited 13×
- HealthOne of Denver, Inc. v. UnitedHealth Group Inc.D. Colorado· 2012-05-30· cited 12×
- Polo Fashions, Inc. v. Diebolt, Inc.D. Kansas· 1986-05-02· cited 10×
- GTE Corp. v. WilliamsD. Utah· 1986-06-30· cited 9×
- King of the Mountain Sports, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.D. Colorado· 1997-07-01· cited 9×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Amstar Corporation v. Domino's Pizza, Inc. And Atlanta Pizza, Inc., Pizza Enterprises, Inc. And Pizza Services, Inc., Hanna Creative Enterprises, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1980-05-02· cited 381×
- Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. Pussycat Cinema, Ltd. And Michael ZaffaranoSecond Circuit· 1979-08-14· cited 356×
- Daryl B. Lundgrin v. W. Graham Claytor, Secretary of the Navy of the United States, and the United StatesTenth Circuit· 1980-04-08· cited 257×
- James Burrough Limited and Kobrand Corporation v. Sign of the Beefeater, Inc., and Montgomery Ward & Co., IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 1976-08-03· cited 244×
- Mabel Penn v. San Juan Hospital, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1975-12-31· cited 241×
- Beer Nuts, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Clover Club Foods Company, Cross-AppellantTenth Circuit· 1983-06-22· cited 133×
- Avrick v. Rockmont Envelope Co.Tenth Circuit· 1946-05-20· cited 117×
- Control Components, Inc., and Richard E. Self v. Valtek, Inc. And Alpha Engineering CompanyFifth Circuit· 1980-01-09· cited 56×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.