Team Tires Plus, Ltd. v. Tires Plus, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the view \that a trademark provides protection only when the defendant uses the mark on directly competing goods . . . is no longer good law\ and has not been since the early 1900s
• “At all times . . . the key inquiry is whether the consumer is likely to be deceived or confused by the similarity of the marks.” (internal quotations omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).