Adams by and Through Adams v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that excluding the plaintiff from the wrestling team because of her gender deprived her of her right to equal protection and that this deprivation \itself\ constituted irreparable harm
• concluding that excluding the plaintiff from the wrestling team because of her gender deprived her of 24 her right to equal protection and that this deprivation “itself” constituted irreparable harm
• finding that a plaintiff had demonstrated irreparable injury where her school refused to allow her to join the wrestling team because of the “injury inherent in a denial of [the] constitutional right[ ]” to .equal protection
• \The public interest would best be served by enjoining the defendants from infringing on the plaintiff's right to equal protection.\
• “The public interest would best be served by enjoining the defendants from infringing on the plaintiff’s right to equal protection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).