Mabel Penn v. San Juan Hospital, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a preliminary injunction is to preserve the status quo and has no bearing on the merits of a case
• observing that, because movant must establish likelihood of success on the merits, “to this extent there is a relation between temporary and permanent relief”
• stating that a preliminary injunction requires “clear proof that [the movant] will probably prevail when the merits are tried, so to this extent there is a relation between temporary and permanent relief”
• stating that the moving party must present “clear proof that he will probably prevail when the merits are tried, so to this extent there is a relation between temporary and permanent relief.”
• stating that the moving party must present “clear proof that he will probably prevail when the merits are tried, so to this extent there is a relation between temporary and permanent relief.”
• stating that one seeking a preliminary injunction must present “clear proof that he will probably prevail when the merits are tried, so to this extent there is a relation between temporary and permanent relief” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).