Fifth Circuit· 1/24/2022

Amin v. Mayorkas

Citations

24 F.4th 383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

suggesting that the court’s view treating the finality requirement as jurisdictional is out of step with Supreme Court rulings
ruling, without any deference to USCIS, that the final merits determination “is consistent with the governing statute and regulation”
noting that the view that the APA’s judicial review provisions are limits on subject matter jurisdiction “may be out of step with recent Supreme Court rulings clarifying that a statue is ‘jurisdictional’ only if Congress says so”
finding it unnecessary to decide whether Auer deference was appropriate because “the result is the same as if [the court] deferred”
“Because the Policy Memo does not create legal rights or obligations, it is not a legislative rule subject to the notice-and-comment requirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.