Supreme Court· 6/3/2019
Mont v. United States
Citations
- 587 U.S. 514
- 139 S. Ct. 1826
- 204 L. Ed. 2d 94
- 2019 U.S. LEXIS 3889
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that pretrial criminal detention later credited as time served for a new conviction tolled period of supervised release
- noting that “[u]nlike most arguments, challenges to subject-matter jurisdiction” may be raised at any time by the parties and “courts must consider them sua sponte”
- recognizing that “in connection with” must have “outer bounds”
- considering both “text and statutory context” when interpreting the term “imprisonment” in 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e)
- interpreting that language in another statute
- “Supervised release is a form of punishment that Congress prescribes along with a term of imprisonment as part of the same sentence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clarence Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. HaymondSupreme Court· 2019-06-26· cited 398×
- United States v. Rosie DigglesFifth Circuit· 2020-04-29· cited 204×
- United States v. HollowaySecond Circuit· 2020-04-24· cited 99×
- The Ohio State Univ. v. Redbubble, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2021-02-25· cited 80×
- United States v. Anthony MooreEleventh Circuit· 2022-01-13· cited 51×
- United States v. Cynthia MontoyaNinth Circuit· 2023-09-13· cited 46×
- Harry Calcutt III v. FDICSixth Circuit· 2022-06-10· cited 38×
- United States v. OliverasSecond Circuit· 2024-03-15· cited 38×
- Amin v. MayorkasFifth Circuit· 2022-01-24· cited 36×
- City of Hoboken v. Chevron CorpThird Circuit· 2022-08-17· cited 31×
- United States v. PegueroSecond Circuit· 2022-05-13· cited 30×
- United States v. Vincent CornerSeventh Circuit· 2020-07-24· cited 28×
- United States v. Colon-MaldonadoFirst Circuit· 2020-03-06· cited 22×
- United States v. Lonnie LillardNinth Circuit· 2019-08-28· cited 20×
- United States v. Leonel Miller Hinojosa, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 2023-05-05· cited 19×
- United States v. Nolan Nathaniel EdwardsEleventh Circuit· 2021-05-13· cited 12×
- United States v. Ronald DamonThird Circuit· 2019-08-06· cited 10×
- Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. UsfwsNinth Circuit· 2022-05-12· cited 10×
- Aargon Agency, Inc. v. Sandy O'LaughlinNinth Circuit· 2023-06-15· cited 9×
- United States v. Abhijit PrasadNinth Circuit· 2021-11-08· cited 8×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 5,104×
- Cutter v. WilkinsonSupreme Court· 2005-05-31· cited 1,462×
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 1,222×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-05-15· cited 941×
- Tapia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 716×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2000-03-21· cited 600×
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. DabitSupreme Court· 2006-03-21· cited 550×
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-12-05· cited 523×
- Maracich v. SpearsSupreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 295×
- Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2010-06-01· cited 274×
- Barber v. ThomasSupreme Court· 2010-06-07· cited 273×
- United States v. American Union Transport, Inc.Supreme Court· 1946-02-25· cited 47×
- United States v. IdeFourth Circuit· 2010-11-12· cited 44×
- United States v. Jose Morales-AlejoNinth Circuit· 1999-10-05· cited 38×
- United States v. GoinsSixth Circuit· 2008-02-13· cited 24×
- United States v. Molina-GazcaFifth Circuit· 2009-06-11· cited 23×
- United States v. JohnsonEleventh Circuit· 2009-09-02· cited 11×
- United States v. Brian MarshD.C. Circuit· 2016-07-19· cited 10×
- LaVergne v. U.S. House of RepresentativesSupreme Court· 2018-11-05· cited 2×
Other cases named Mont v. United States
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.