Federal Circuit· 5/8/2019
Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
Citations
- 923 F.3d 1023
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[D]ifferent claim terms are presumed to have different meanings.” (quoting Helmsderfer v. Bobrick Washroom Equip., Inc., 527 F.3d 1379, 1382 (Fed. Cir. 2008))
- “[D]ifferent claim terms are presumed to have different meanings.” (quoting Helmsderfer v. Bobrick Washroom Equip., Inc., 527 F.3d 1379, 1382 (Fed. Cir. 2008))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lourie, O'Malley, Reyna
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Natera, Inc. v. Neogenomics Laboratories, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2024-07-12· cited 19×
- Nexstep, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLCFederal Circuit· 2024-10-24· cited 8×
- George v. SmithW.D. Wisconsin· 2006-12-22· cited 6×
- Biogen International Gmbh v. Banner Life Sciences LLCFederal Circuit· 2020-04-21· cited 3×
- Synchronoss Technologies, Inc v. Dropbox, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2021-02-12
- Finjan LLC v. Sonicwall, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2023-10-13
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court· 2016-06-09· cited 794×
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court· 2015-01-20· cited 634×
- Victoria Zetwick v. County of YoloNinth Circuit· 2017-02-23· cited 553×
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2009-09-11· cited 489×
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1989-01-19· cited 325×
- Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Sheriff DepartmentNinth Circuit· 2008-07-02· cited 237×
- Merck & Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2005-01-28· cited 236×
- Glaxo, Inc., and Glaxo Group Limited v. Novopharm, Ltd.Federal Circuit· 1997-04-04· cited 213×
- Warner-Lambert Company v. Apotex Corp., Apotex, Inc., and Torpharm, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2003-01-16· cited 179×
- Wallace London and Clemco Products, Inc. v. Carson Pirie Scott & Co., Marshall Field Stores, Inc., W. Bell & Co., Inc., and Samsonite CorporationFederal Circuit· 1991-10-17· cited 168×
- Marvin MacKey Lillian MacKey Husband and Wife v. Pioneer National Bank, a National Banking Corporation Paul Campbell, Marie Campbell, Husband and WifeNinth Circuit· 1989-01-31· cited 167×
- Applied Medical Resources Corp. v. United States Surgical Corp.Federal Circuit· 2006-05-15· cited 136×
- Helmsderfer v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2008-06-04· cited 124×
- Elekta Instrument S.A. v. O.U.R. Scientific International, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2000-06-01· cited 120×
- Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2013-09-26· cited 91×
- Matteo Brunozzi v. Cable Communications, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2017-03-21· cited 88×
- In Re: Micron Technology, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2017-11-15· cited 70×
- United States v. JP Morgan Chase Bank AccountNinth Circuit· 2016-09-01· cited 68×
- Duncan Parking Technologies v. Ips Group, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2019-01-31· cited 64×
- Unwired Planet, LLC v. Apple Inc.Federal Circuit· 2016-07-22· cited 61×
Other cases named Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
9 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Federal Circuit· 2017-12-14· cited 15×
- Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Federal Circuit· 2015-07-21· cited 9×
- Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Federal Circuit· 2023-04-19· cited 4×
- Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.N.D. California· 2017-12-19· cited 2×
- Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Supreme Court· 2016-06-20
- Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Supreme Court· 2017-01-13
- Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Supreme Court· 2017-02-21
- Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Supreme Court· 2017-04-13
- Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Federal Circuit· 2023-04-19
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.