Skip to main content
· 1/31/1989

Marvin MacKey Lillian MacKey Husband and Wife v. Pioneer National Bank, a National Banking Corporation Paul Campbell, Marie Campbell, Husband and Wife

Citations

  • 867 F.2d 520
  • 13 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 638
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 815
  • 1989 WL 5881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that § 24(Fifth) “has been consistently interpreted to mean that the board of directors of a national bank may dismiss an officer without liability for breach of the agreement to employ”
  • holding that § 24(Fifth) “has been consistently interpreted to mean that the board of directors of a national bank may dismiss an officer without liability for breach of the agreement to employ”
  • stating that “[a] movant cannot complain if it fails diligently to pursue discovery before summary judgment.”
  • explaining that a moving party is not entitled to additional discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f) “if it fails diligently to pursue discovery before summary judgment”
  • “A movant cannot complain if it fails diligently to pursue 11 discovery before summary judgment.”
  • “A movant cannot 23 complain if [he] fails diligently to pursue discovery before summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beezer, Hall, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.