Supreme Court· 6/9/2016

Dietz v. Bouldin

Citations

579 U.S. 40
195 L. Ed. 2d 161
2016 U.S. LEXIS 3772
136 S. Ct. 1885
26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 220
84 U.S.L.W. 4371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “district courts have the inherent authority to manage their dockets and courtrooms with a view toward the efficient and expedient resolution of cases”
recognizing that “courts have the inherent authority to manage their dockets and courtrooms with a view toward the efficient and expedient resolution of cases.”
recognizing that a district court cannot invoke its inherent power to circumvent the harmless-error inquiry prescribed in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(a)
recognizing that a complaint may be stricken sua sponte under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f)
stating that “district courts have the inherent authority to manage their dockets and courtrooms with a view toward the efficient and expedient resolution of cases”
recognizing a district court’s inherent authority to manage its docket “with a “view toward the efficient and expedient resolution of cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

128 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Dietz v. Bouldin

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.