Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “subsidiary decisions underlying a damage[s] theory,” such as “the methodology for arriving at a reasonable roy- alty,” are reviewed for abuse of discretion (citations omit- ted)
• reasonable royalty must be based upon the entirety of the evidence, including parties’ evidence of their financial conditions and willingness to enter into a license
• “If purchasers are motivated to purchase because of particular features of a product available only from the patent owner and infringers, products without such features would obviously not be acceptable noninfringing substitutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).