American Postal Workers Union v. Anthony M. Frank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the complaint’s allegations that the plaintiff would have paid less for a product if not for the defendant’s misrepresentations would be “refer[red] to . . . as ‘overpayment’”
• requiring \realistic risk\ of future harm as a predicate for standing
• elucidating doctrinal parameters of Lyons

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).