American Oversight v. HHS

Oral argument

• Argued

  52 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the Legislature is not required to be overly repetitive in its choice of language”
• explaining that it is well established that statutes must be read together and, thus, no single section should be viewed in isolation
• stating that the Court “may not read into the statute what is not within the Legislature’s intent as derived from the language of the statute”
• “[Ulnless the Legislature indicates otherwise, when it repeatedly uses the same phrase in a statute, that phrase should be given the same meaning throughout the statute.”
• “[U]nless the Legislature indicates otherwise, when it repeatedly uses the same phrase in a statute, that phrase should be given the same meaning throughout the statute.”
• “[ujnless the Legislature indicates otherwise, when it repeatedly uses the same phrase in a statute, that phrase should be given the same meaning throughout the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).