Marc Truitt v. Department of State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that once an “agency becomes reasonably clear as to the materials desired, FOIA’s text and legislative history make plain the agency’s obligation to bring them forth”
• denying summary judgment because missing records left “substantial doubt as to the sufficiency of the search”
• “The adequacy of an agency’s search is measured by a ‘standard of reasonableness,’ and is ‘dependent upon the circumstances of the case.’ ” (footnote and citation omitted)
• “If, however, the record leaves substantial doubt as to the sufficiency of the search, summary judgment for the agency is not proper”
• “If, however, the record leaves substantial doubt as to the sufficiency of the search, summary judgment for the agency is not proper.”
• “If, however, the record leaves substantial doubt as to the sufficiency of the search, summary judgment for the agency is not proper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).