Skip to main content
· 3/1/1991

Access Reports v. Department of Justice

Citations

  • 926 F.2d 1192
  • 288 U.S. App. D.C. 319
  • 18 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1840
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 3198
  • 1991 WL 24462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that assertion of exemption does not turn on the ability of the agency to identify a specific decision to which the document contributed
  • noting that the predecisional requirement “focuses attention on the role of the [information] in the decisionmaking process”
  • explaining the difference between the predecisional requirement and the deliberative requirement and noting that agencies may withhold only those portions of a predecisional document that are also deliberative
  • focusing inquiry on whether disclosure “would discourage candid discussion within the agency”
  • “[A]n agency asserting the privilege must show that the document is both ‘predecisional’ and ‘deliberative.’
  • “A key feature under both the predecisional and deliberative criteria is the relation between the author and recipients of the document.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikva, Williams, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.