Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, based on nearly identical language in a previous version of the statute, that \[a] defendant who enters a plea of guilty or nolo contendere may not seek postconviction DNA testing based on the language of the statute\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Menendez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-11· cited 2×
• Reed v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-21· cited 2×
• Fuentes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-20· cited 1×
• Delidle v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-13· cited 1×
• Rawls v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-25
• Brim v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-28
• Davis v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-10-15

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Amendment to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-10-18· cited 18×
• Stewart v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-21· cited 9×
• Reighn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-14· cited 5×
• Epps v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-22· cited 3×