Stewart v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Florida DNA testing statute referring to defendant who “‘has been tried and found guilty’” excludes defendant who pled guilty or nolo contendere

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Winslow
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2007-11-02· cited 58×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-16· cited 7×
• Lindsey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-08· cited 3×
• Reed v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-21· cited 2×
• Delidle v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-13· cited 1×
• Rawls v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-25
• Sesler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-29
• Linssens v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-18
• Isom v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-09

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Amendment to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-10-18· cited 18×
• Reighn v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-14· cited 5×
• Epps v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-22· cited 3×