Skip to main content
· 11/27/1978

Amend v. United States

Citations

  • 439 U.S. 985

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that conflict would be exacerbated by requiring participation of foreign authorities in all discovery of foreign parties
  • “The Blocking Statute obviously is a manifestation of French displeasure with American pre-trial discovery procedures, which are significantly broader than the procedures accepted in other countries”
  • deferred to German law ordering use of letters rogatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.