United States v. J. Michael Robilotto, Louis D. Spagnola and Anthony v. Civitello, Defendants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that RICO forfeiture, unlike forfeiture under other statutes, is imposed directly on the individual rather than against the property itself
• personal loans received by a union official because of his status were sufficiently related to the enterprise
• personal loans received by a union official because of his status were sufficiently related to the enterprise
• “The Court held that, in a labor context, the Hobbs Act ‘does not apply to the use of force to achieve legitimate labor ends.’” (quoting United States v. Enmons, 410 U.S. 396, 401 (1973))
• money judgment under 18 U.S.C. § 1963

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).