Ninth Circuit· 1/15/1997
Amarel v. Connell
Citations
- 102 F.3d 1494
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that \the nature of the plaintiff's alleged injury is of `tremendous signifi- cance' in determining whether a plaintiff has antitrust standing\
- injury direct where price of milled rice directly affected price of paddy rice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kamakana v. City and County of HonoluluNinth Circuit· 2006-05-16· cited 2,412×
- Dubbs Ex Rel. Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2003-07-21· cited 658×
- John Louis Lalonde v. County of Riverside, Robert Moquin, and Jason Horton, OpinionNinth Circuit· 2000-02-25· cited 354×
- American Ad Management, Inc. v. General Telephone Company Of CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1999-09-09· cited 140×
- Theme Promotions, Inc. v. News America Marketing FSINinth Circuit· 2008-08-19· cited 139×
- Navellier v. SlettenNinth Circuit· 2001-08-27· cited 132×
- Cascade Health Solutions v. PeaceHealthNinth Circuit· 2008-01-31· cited 129×
- Watson Carpet & Floor Covering, Inc. v. Mohawk Industries, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2011-06-22· cited 93×
- Barber v. T.D. Williamson, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2001-07-02· cited 89×
- Williams v. GayeNinth Circuit· 2018-03-21· cited 74×
- Caudle v. Bristow Optical Co.Ninth Circuit· 2000-09-14· cited 69×
- Reinsdorf v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.C.D. California· 2013-07-19· cited 55×
- Lucas Automotive Engineering, Inc. v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1998-03-31· cited 49×
- Delta Savings Bank v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 2001-07-12· cited 48×
- Granite Partners, L.P. v. Bear, Stearns & Co.S.D. New York· 1999-07-26· cited 40×
- In re Wellpoint, Inc. Out-of-Network \UCR\ Rates LitigationC.D. California· 2012-09-06· cited 40×
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. HoustonNinth Circuit· 1998-06-24· cited 34×
- Headwaters Forest Defense v. County of HumboldtNinth Circuit· 2001-01-31· cited 28×
- Loeb Industries, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp.Seventh Circuit· 2002-09-20· cited 25×
- Abada v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.S.D. California· 2000-10-02· cited 23×
Cites
64 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,116×
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 2,474×
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,155×
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court· 1961-04-03· cited 1,996×
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court· 1972-01-13· cited 1,621×
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 1,473×
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court· 1993-06-18· cited 1,200×
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-05-03· cited 953×
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. USA Petroleum Co.Supreme Court· 1990-05-14· cited 783×
- Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 680×
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1964-12-14· cited 471×
- Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co.Supreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 435×
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1982-02-10· cited 371×
- Wold v. WoldSupreme Court· 1982-10-04· cited 312×
- Summit Health, Ltd. v. PinhasSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 236×
- Waymon M. Berry v. William J. BunnellNinth Circuit· 1994-11-09· cited 194×
- Amarel v. ConnellNinth Circuit· 1996-12-02· cited 189×
- Intel Corporation v. Terabyte International, Inc., Jean Hsu, Kenneth HsuNinth Circuit· 1993-09-27· cited 188×
- General Signal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1995-09-26· cited 169×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.