Theme Promotions, Inc. v. News America Marketing FSI

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that suit was not objectively baseless where it was “potentially meritorious”
• noting that one method of determining whether a proposed market is viable is assessing “whether a monopolist in the proposed market could profitably impose a small but significant and nontransitory price increase”
• discussing the doctrine in relation to an intentional interference with prospective economic advantage claim premised on the defendant’s litigation -threats
• finding a potential evidentiary error harmless where other admitted evidence established the same element of a claim
• “Noerr–Pennington doctrine applies to … state law tortious 21 interference with prospective economic advantage claims.”
• applying doctrine to state law claims alleging tortious interference with prospective economic advantage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).