State v. Horne
Citations
- 52 Fla. 125
Syllabus
<p>1. Where a prisoner has accepted a conditional pardon and has been released from imprisonment by virtue thereof, but has violated or failed to perform the condition, conditions or any of them, the pardon in case of a condition precedent does not take effect, and in case of a condition subsequent becomes void and the criminal may thereupon be re-arrested and compelled to undergo the punishment imposed by his original sentence or so much thereof as he had not suffered at the time of his release.</p> <p>2. A conditional pardon may by its express terms provide that upon violation of the conditions the offender shall be liable to summary arrest and re-commitment for the unexpired portion of his original sentence. Such stipulations upon aceptance of the pardon become binding upon the convict and authorize his re-arrest and re-commitment in the manner and by or through the officials authorized as stipulated in the pardon.</p> <p>3. Under a statute which provides that “in all cases the court shall award the sentence and shall fix the punishment or penalty prescribed by law,” the power of the court extends to fixing the punishment, that is, the length of time within the given maximum a prisoner should be imprisoned. The law does not contemplate that the court in fixing the punishment shall also fix the beginning and end of the period during which the imprisonment shall be suffered. The time fixed for executing a sentence or for the commencement of its execution is not one of its esential elements, and strictly speaking is not a part of the sentence at all. The essential part of the sentence is the punishment, including the hind of punishment and the amount thereof without reference to the time when it shall be inflicted. • The sentence with reference to the kind of punishment and the amount thereof should as a rule be strictly executed. But an order of the court with refernce to the time when the sentence shall be executed is not so material. Expiration of time without im
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mitchell v. GreenoughNinth Circuit· 1938-11-18· cited 71×
- Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court· 1951-03-21· cited 69×
- Fleenor v. HammondSixth Circuit· 1941-01-13· cited 55×
- United States v. George Gordon LiddyD.C. Circuit· 1975-03-17· cited 47×
- Wilborn v. SaundersSupreme Court of Virginia· 1938-03-10· cited 30×
- United States v. Pasquale Matassini, A/K/A Pat Matassini, and Robert E. RodriguezFifth Circuit· 1978-01-10· cited 29×
- State Ex Rel. Libtz v. ColemanSupreme Court of Florida· 1941-12-12· cited 27×
- Moulthrope v. MatusSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1952-11-25· cited 25×
- Hudson v. YouellSupreme Court of Virginia· 1942-04-13· cited 23×
- People ex rel. Brackett v. KaiserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1924-06-27· cited 19×
- Richard Lee Morgan v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary of the Dept. Of Offender Rehabilitation and Jim Smith, Attorney General of the State of FloridaEleventh Circuit· 1982-05-17· cited 12×
- State Ex Rel. Bedford v. McCorkleTennessee Supreme Court· 1931-07-18· cited 12×
- State Ex Rel. Shotkin v. BuchananDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-02-19· cited 11×
- Tyler v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court· 2007-02-23· cited 10×
- Kirkpatrick v. HollowellSupreme Court of Iowa· 1923-12-14· cited 10×
- In re McKinneySuperior Court of Delaware· 1927-07-15· cited 6×
- McMahon v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida· 1957-02-13· cited 6×
- State ex rel. Bailey v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida· 1953-04-17· cited 5×
- Sinclair v. State ex rel. McShaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1957-11-26· cited 5×
- Law v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida· 1972-06-07· cited 5×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dolan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1869-03-15· cited 51×
- In re Conditional Discharge of ConvictsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1901-05-29· cited 43×
- Alvarez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 37×
- Fite v. State, ex rel. SniderTennessee Supreme Court· 1905-04-15· cited 20×
- Ex parte BellMississippi Supreme Court· 1879-01-15· cited 19×
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1890-01-07· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.