New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 5/19/1958
State v. Moretti
Citations
- 141 A.2d 810
- 50 N.J. Super. 223
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating courts should not revoke probation due to a mere technical violation
- even where the State proved that a condition of probation was not satisfied, it was not a violation because \defendant established valid excuses.\
- while revocation of probation is discretionary, trial court will be reversed for a gross or manifest abuse of discretion
- hospitalization for psychiatric treatment was lawful excuse for violation of condition that probationer obtain employment
- failure to \work faithfully at suitable employment\
- failure to obtain gainful employment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Price, Haneman and Schettino
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ReyesNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-01-22· cited 62×
- Gutierrez, Maricela RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-10-10· cited 60×
- Spann v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1977-04-04· cited 37×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-06-12· cited 33×
- Humphrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-04-22· cited 31×
- State v. Nelson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-07-15· cited 28×
- State v. ZachowskiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1959-01-13· cited 24×
- State v. NakamuraHawaii Supreme Court· 1978-07-28· cited 21×
- United States v. ManfredoniaS.D. New York· 1972-03-31· cited 20×
- State v. WassermanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1962-07-13· cited 19×
- State v. GibsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-03-03· cited 16×
- Herold v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-09-02· cited 15×
- State v. GenerosoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-03-06· cited 14×
- State v. DevattNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-04-01· cited 10×
- State v. LebbingNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-04-12· cited 8×
- State v. BraeunigNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1975-06-16· cited 6×
- State v. SerioNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-05-09· cited 6×
- State v. JordonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1965-02-26· cited 5×
- State v. ThomasNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-12-31· cited 4×
- State v. McCainNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-06-09· cited 3×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 804×
- Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 742×
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-12-05· cited 523×
- Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1951-05-21· cited 97×
- Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court· 1951-03-21· cited 69×
- Midler v. HeinowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1952-06-16· cited 64×
- Smith v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1951-12-12· cited 61×
- Hartpence v. GrouleffSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1954-05-31· cited 61×
- NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1956-05-31· cited 37×
- Alvarez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1905-06-15· cited 37×
- Adamo v. McCorkleSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1953-11-23· cited 33×
- Florentine v. LandonSupreme Court· 1954-03-15· cited 33×
- Davis & Banker, Inc. v. MetcalfWashington Supreme Court· 1924-10-07· cited 13×
- Day v. DonohueSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1898-11-14· cited 13×
- Hartpence v. GrouleffNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1953-11-02· cited 7×
- State v. WoodSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1850-10-15· cited 7×
- Gagliano v. MaggioNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1954-09-30· cited 3×
- State v. PollastrelliNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1954-01-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.