Skip to main content

Alston v. Blythe

Citations

  • 88 Wash. App. 26

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if a driver waved a pedestrian to cross in front of his truck, he had a duty to use reasonable care to ensure that plaintiff’s safety
  • holding that if a driver waived a pedestrian to cross in front of his truck, he had a duty to use reasonable care to ensure that plaintiff’s safety
  • stating that such error is harmless unless there is a reasonable likelihood the outcome of the trial would have been different without it
  • affirming trial court instruction that statutory violation “ ‘is not necessarily negligence, but may be considered by you as evidence in determining negligence’ ”
  • distinguishing its facts from Jung noting evidence, if believed, indicating the injured pedestrian ran into driver's lane from in front of stopped truck and into the left side of driver's car, and thus failed to exercise ordinary care for her own safety
  • distinguishing its facts from Jung noting evidence, if believed, indicating the injured pedestrian ran into driver’s lane from in front of stopped truck and into the left side of driver’s car, and thus failed to exercise ordinary care for her own safety

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morgan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Alston v. Blythe

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.