· 8/13/2013
Gorman v. Pierce County
Citations
- 176 Wash. App. 63
- 307 P.3d 795
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “To determine what a condemnee must prove to satisfy Section 705’s unified purpose language, we look to Section 705’s legislative history and our subsequent case law.”
- “To determine what a condemnee must prove to satisfy Section 705’s unified purpose language, we look to Section 705’s legislative history and our subsequent case law.”
- \[t]o raise the size of the property condemned after a petition for appointment of viewers has been filed can result in substantial prejudice to the condemnor.\
- plot plans constitute \the heart of a declaration of taking\ - size of property condemned presents basic issue which must be decided at earliest possible stage
- plot plans constitute “the heart of a declaration of taking” — size of property condemned presents basic issue which must be decided at earliest possible stage
- “[t]o raise the size of the property condemned after a petition for appointment of viewers has been filed can result in substantial prejudice to the condemnor.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Deren, Penoyar, Worswick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.