Skip to main content
· 8/13/2013

Gorman v. Pierce County

Citations

  • 176 Wash. App. 63
  • 307 P.3d 795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “To determine what a condemnee must prove to satisfy Section 705’s unified purpose language, we look to Section 705’s legislative history and our subsequent case law.”
  • “To determine what a condemnee must prove to satisfy Section 705’s unified purpose language, we look to Section 705’s legislative history and our subsequent case law.”
  • \[t]o raise the size of the property condemned after a petition for appointment of viewers has been filed can result in substantial prejudice to the condemnor.\
  • plot plans constitute \the heart of a declaration of taking\ - size of property condemned presents basic issue which must be decided at earliest possible stage
  • plot plans constitute “the heart of a declaration of taking” — size of property condemned presents basic issue which must be decided at earliest possible stage
  • “[t]o raise the size of the property condemned after a petition for appointment of viewers has been filed can result in substantial prejudice to the condemnor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deren, Penoyar, Worswick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.