Washington Supreme Court· 12/15/1994

Price v. Kitsap Transit

Citations

886 P.2d 556
125 Wash. 2d 456
1994 Wash. LEXIS 773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that \intentional torts are part of a wholly different legal realm and are inapposite to the determination of fault\ under the tort reform act
\a statute will not be construed in derogation of the common law unless the Legislature has clearly expressed its intention to vary it\
our review is limited to whether substantial evidence supports the findings, and whether the findings support the conclusions of law and judgment
\[A] statute will not be construed in derogation of the common law unless the Legislature has clearly expressed its intention to vary it.\
the court finds a given settlement is reasonable as among the parties before the court and given the facts presented
our review is limited to whether substantial evidence supports the findings, and whether the findings support the conclusions of law and judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Utter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Price v. Kitsap Transit

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.