Alpert v. Riley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no evidence that defendant “intended” to make information on a computer available to third parties
• concluding that there was no evidence that defendant “intended” to make information on a computer available to third parties
• finding that Texas Rule of Evidence 503 requirements for establishing privilege are similar to those required under federal common law
• “Like [Federal Rule of Evidence] 502, [Rule 193.3(d)] does not appear to govern the effect of disclosures that do not occur in discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Royce Homes, LP
  S.D. Texas· 2011-03-11· cited 8×
• the City of Houston, Texas v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-06-24
• In re McDowell
  S.D. Texas· 2012-11-16

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Upjohn Co. v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 3,227×
• Lance v. Dennis
  Supreme Court· 2006-02-21· cited 983×
• United States v. Zolin
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 923×
• Jaffee v. Redmond
  Supreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 915×
• United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1982-08-13· cited 262×
• John G. & Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation v. Dewhurst
  Texas Supreme Court· 2002-08-29· cited 180×
• United States v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  First Circuit· 1997-11-25· cited 119×
• Timothy Alldread v. City of Grenada
  Fifth Circuit· 1993-04-27· cited 117×
• United States v. Neal
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-07-21· cited 114×
• John Wesley Clutchette v. Ruth Rushen
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-09-11· cited 110×
• United States v. Jose De La Jara
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-08-21· cited 104×
• United States v. Robinson
  Fifth Circuit· 1997-08-29· cited 85×
• Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co.
  S.D. New York· 1985-01-09· cited 77×
• Hartford Fire Insurance v. Garvey
  N.D. California· 1985-12-20· cited 74×
• Granada Corp. v. Honorable First Court of Appeals
  Texas Supreme Court· 1993-01-20· cited 73×
• Willy v. Administrative Review Board
  Fifth Circuit· 2005-08-25· cited 59×
• H. Donald Ratliff, Frank H. Cullen, and John J. Jarvis v. Davis Polk & Wardwell, Baan Company, N v. Amal M. Johnson, Jaan Baan and Tom Tinsley
  Second Circuit· 2003-12-30· cited 40×
• Ferko v. National Ass'n for Stock Car Auto Racing, Inc.
  E.D. Texas· 2003-10-17· cited 38×
• In Re Grand Jury (Impounded)
  Third Circuit· 1998-03-13· cited 37×
• First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Pittsburgh v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
  S.D. New York· 1986-05-28· cited 28×