Skip to main content
· 8/25/2005

Willy v. Administrative Review Board

Citations

  • 423 F.3d 483
  • 2005 WL 2038543

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that in particular circumstances, federal law of privilege governs rather than state law
  • “[W]hen a party entitled to claim the attorney-client privilege uses confidential information against his adversary (the sword), he implicitly waives its use protectively (the shield) under that privilege.”
  • “[W]hen a party entitled to claim the attorney-client privilege uses confidential information against his adversary (the sword), he implicitly waives its use protectively (the shield) under that privilege.”
  • “The case law amply demonstrates the narrower proposition that the attorney-client privilege only prohibits a party from simultaneously using confidential information as both a shield and a sword.” (collecting cases)
  • reviewing Appointments Clause challenge “de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Wiener, Barksdale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.