John Wesley Clutchette v. Ruth Rushen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Rule 4 contains no fixed time requirement and gives district court discretion to grant appropriate deadline in habeas cases
• explaining 2 that pursuant to Habeas Rule 4, the federal court has discretion to fix a time to file an 3 answer beyond the time periods set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2243
• “The attorney-client privilege is a creation of the common law, and a violation of this privilege generally does not constitute” a constitutional violation.
• pursuant to Habeas Rule 4, the federal court has discretion to fix a time to file 22 an answer beyond the time periods set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2243
• pursuant to Habeas Rule 4, the federal court has discretion to fix a time to file 12 an answer beyond the time periods set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2243
• pursuant to Habeas Rule 4, the federal court has discretion to fix a time to file 12 an answer beyond the time periods set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2243

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).