Skip to main content
· 1/20/1993

Granada Corp. v. Honorable First Court of Appeals

Citations

  • 844 S.W.2d 223
  • 1992 WL 369225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claim of privilege as to inadvertently produced document was waived where not asserted until eleven months after production
  • recognizing that the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege applies only if a prima facie case of contemplated fraud is made by the party seeking discovery
  • holding that claim of privilege as to inadvertently produced document was waived where not asserted until eleven months after production
  • acknowledging that appeal was an inadequate remedy where protected documents were essential to plaintiff's claims and trial court's order prevented plaintiff from maintaining his cause of action
  • noting as evidence of Granada’s failure to preserve the privilege the fact that it did not seek to remedy the error until 11 months after disclosure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mauzy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.