Skip to main content

Alonzo v. State

Citations

  • 67 S.W.3d 346
  • 2001 WL 1636404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying rule 44.2(a) to error in admissibility of evidence when error violated defendant = s due process right to present a defense
  • applying rule 44.2(a) to error in admissibility of evidence when error violated defendant’s due process right to present a defense
  • applying rule 44.2(a) to error in admissibility of evidence when error violated defendant’s due process right to present a defense
  • “[C]ompared with the usual case in which hearsay is conveyed at trial by a third-person who recounts what the declarant said, this hearsay is recounted by the declarant . . . thus eliminating any distortions by a third-person.”
  • “[C]ompared with the usual case in which hearsay is conveyed at trial by a third-person who recounts what the declarant said, this hearsay is recounted by the declarant . . . thus eliminating any distortions by a third- person.”
  • A [C]ompared with the usual case in which hearsay is conveyed at trial by a third-person who recounts what the declarant said, this hearsay is recounted by the declarant . . . thus eliminating any distortions by a third-person. @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Vance, Gray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.