Skip to main content

Almanza v. State

Citations

  • 839 S.W.2d 817
  • 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 174
  • 1992 WL 222186

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Miranda warnings preceded questioning but statement did not come within § 3(c) exception to article 38.22
  • Miranda warnings preceded questioning but statement did not come within § 3(c) exception to article 38.22
  • Miranda warnings preceded questioning but statement did not come within § 3(c) exception to article 38.22
  • defendant nodded toward dresser where drugs were later located
  • defendant’s custodial statement that that a piece of paper later found 7 to contain heroin was his “personal stuff,” made without Miranda warnings, was not admissible under subsection 3(c) because it was a mere admission of guilt and was not “found to be true”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, White, McCormick, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.