Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 3/10/1993
Gunter v. State
Citations
- 858 S.W.2d 430
- 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 59
- 1993 WL 62089
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- age 20, abandoned by mother, adopted by strict parents, emotional and behavioral problems, hearing impairment, learning disorder
- mitigation evidence that defendant was abandoned by mother, abused as a child, and subject to strict discipline by adopted parents who sent him to school unbathed and unfed as punishment could be considered under special issues
- construing article 38.22, section 3(c)
- construing article 38.22, section 3(c)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baird, Campbell, Clinton, Maloney, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-02-01· cited 1,534×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-04-21· cited 684×
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-03-27· cited 418×
- Banda v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-14· cited 397×
- Ransom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-04-24· cited 360×
- Matamoros v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-06-14· cited 289×
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-12-08· cited 198×
- Riley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-21· cited 133×
- Barton v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1994-07-22· cited 123×
- Elliott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-04-14· cited 74×
- Ex Parte GonzalesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-10-18· cited 58×
- Guardiola v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-06-15· cited 46×
- Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-03-01· cited 44×
- Pachecano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-07-26· cited 34×
- Criner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-09· cited 34×
- Matthews v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1997-07-31· cited 30×
- Cameron v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-06-23· cited 25×
- Manley v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-08-31· cited 23×
- Mines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-11-30· cited 21×
- Dorsey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1996-12-20· cited 21×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,907×
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-11-21· cited 2,504×
- Geesa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-11-06· cited 2,157×
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,718×
- California v. BrownSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 1,207×
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-04-05· cited 713×
- Gray v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 634×
- Graham v. CollinsSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 630×
- Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-03-01· cited 490×
- Stanford v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1989-08-30· cited 438×
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-03-25· cited 399×
- Davis v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-12-06· cited 352×
- DeBlanc v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-11-28· cited 288×
- Nobles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-10· cited 267×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.