Skip to main content

Allen v. State

Citations

  • 890 S.E.2d 700
  • 317 Ga. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the appellant forfeited his ineffective assistance of counsel claim where he “did not raise [the] claim . . . in his initial motion for new trial or the amendments made thereto by appellate counsel. He did not raise such a claim in the hearing on the motion”
  • explaining that the appellant forfeited his ineffective assistance of counsel claim where he “did not raise [the] claim . . . in his initial motion for new trial or the amendments made thereto by appellate counsel. He did not raise such a claim in the hearing on the motion”
  • cumulative prejudice claim failed where the appellant did not show prejudice from any of the assumed deficiencies of counsel
  • “‘A nonconstitutional error is harmless if the State shows that it is highly probable that the error did not contribute to the verdict.’”
  • “A nonconstitutional error is harmless if the State shows that it is highly probable that the error did not contribute to the verdict.”
  • as the finder of fact, the trial court “is not required to credit testimony merely because it is unrebutted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.