Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/18/1990

Keating v. Cinema 7, Inc.

Citations

  • 496 U.S. 943
  • 110 S. Ct. 3230
  • 110 L. Ed. 2d 676
  • 58 U.S.L.W. 3801
  • 1990 U.S. LEXIS 3172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the fear experienced by the victim before death is a significant factor in determining the existence of this aggravating circumstance
  • recognizing difference between defendant’s knowing that product may run into snags and knowing it has already developed problems so significant as to require months of delay
  • this court may affirm a grant of summary judgment on any ground fairly supported by the record
  • “There is a difference between knowing that any product in development may run into a few snags and knowing that a particular product has already developed problems. ...”
  • “Insider trading in suspicious amounts or at suspicious times is probative of bad faith and scienter.”
  • unusual insider trading activity during class period may permit inference of bad faith and scienter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

185 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Keating v. Cinema 7, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.