Skip to main content

Alfano v. BDO Seidman, LLP

Citations

  • 925 A.2d 22
  • 393 N.J. Super. 560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a nonsignatory could compel arbitration against the plaintiff because holding otherwise would “permit[] [the plaintiff] to avoid the practical consequences of his agreement to arbitrate”
  • holding that \[u]nder [9 U.S.C. § 3] the court must stay an arbitrable action pending its arbitration\ after one of the parties applied for a stay
  • holding that the [FAA] applied to an arbitration agreement because the transactions at issue occurred between a New Jersey resident and a German corporation in New York
  • finding that \[u]nder [9 U.S.C. § 3] the court must stay an arbitrable action pending its arbitration\ after one of the parties applied for a stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Kestin, Graves and Lihotz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.