Skip to main content
· 8/7/2013

Michael E. Hirsch v. Amper Financial Services, LLC (070751)

Citations

  • 215 N.J. 174
  • 71 A.3d 849
  • 2013 WL 4005282
  • 2013 N.J. LEXIS 823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, in appropriate circumstances, “arbitration may be compelled by a non-signatory against a signatory to a contract” (citing Arthur Andersen, 556 U.S. at 631)
  • rejecting application of equitable estoppel where an arbitration clause \makes no mention\ of the party seeking to apply estoppel and \does not embrace any express inclusion of claims involving\ parties other than the signatories to the agreement.
  • equitable estoppel “prevent[s] a party’s disavowal of previous conduct if such repudiation would not be responsive to the demands of justice and good conscience” (citation omitted)
  • applying the same two-step procedure under New Jersey law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: LaVECCHIA

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.