Skip to main content
· 10/17/2011

Baskett v. KWOKLEUNG CHEUNG

Citations

  • 28 A.3d 1255
  • 422 N.J. Super. 377
  • 2011 WL 4905493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding good cause for reinstatement of a complaint in part because the defendant did not present a \scintilla of evidence\ supporting his claim of prejudice
  • finding good cause for reinstatement of a complaint in part because the defendant did not present a \scintilla of evidence\ supporting his claim of prejudice
  • finding good cause for reinstatement of a complaint in part because the defendant did not present a \scintilla of evidence\ supporting his claim of prejudice
  • finding good cause for reinstatement of a complaint in part because the defendant did not present a \scintilla of evidence\ supporting his claim of prejudice
  • reiterating the well-established principle that appellate review of trial court rulings on reinstatement motions is guided by an abuse of discretion standard
  • reversing denial of the plaintiff's motion to reinstate a complaint under Rule 1:13-7(a) where the defendant presented only A-5471-18T1 10 arguments claiming prejudice and failed to present \a scintilla of evidence\ establishing prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Fuentes, J.N. Harris, and Koblitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.