Skip to main content

Alexandru v. Strong

Citations

  • 81 Conn. App. 68
  • 837 A.2d 875
  • 2004 Conn. App. LEXIS 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • pleading was a legal malpractice claim cloaked in contractual language, where plaintiff alleged that defendant breached his contractual duties by failing to file negligent infliction of emotional distress action within applicable limitations period
  • “[w]here the plaintiff alleges that the defendant negligently performed legal services and failed to use due diligence the complaint sounds in negligence, even though he also alleges that he retained or engaged his services.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLachlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Alexandru v. Strong

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.