Skip to main content

Labow v. Labow

Citations

  • 85 Conn. App. 746
  • 858 A.2d 882
  • 2004 Conn. App. LEXIS 462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “as a general matter, a motion to dismiss is not the proper procedural instrument for challenging the applicability of § 52-592 (a)”
  • ‘‘[a]s we have stated on occasions too numerous to recite, mere abstract assertions, unaccom- panied by reasoned analysis, will not suffice to apprise a court adequately of the precise nature of a claim’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berdon, McLachlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.