Skip to main content

Alexandru v. Dowd

Citations

  • 79 Conn. App. 434
  • 830 A.2d 352
  • 2003 Conn. App. LEXIS 405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, because “the defendant was absolutely privileged to publish the allegedly defamatory statements at issue,” the defendant was entitled to summary judgment as to the plaintiff’s libel, slander, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lavery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Alexandru v. Dowd

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.