Turner v. Burnside

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a procedure may be unavailable and the failure to exhaust it may be excusable if its unavailability is caused by extreme threats of physical retaliation
• concluding that “a prison official’s serious threats of substantial retaliation against an inmate for lodging or pursuing in good faith a grievance make the administrative remedy ‘unavailable[.]’”
• holding that the PLRA’s exhaustion requirement “does not require inmates to craft new procedures when prison officials demonstrate ... that they will refuse to abide by the established ones”
• holding that a threat renders a prison grievance system unavailable when “(1
• holding that a threat renders a prison grievance system unavailable when “(1
• holding that a prison official’s threats of retaliation can render grievance process unavailable if: “(1) the threat actually did deter the plaintiff inmate from lodging a grievance or pursuing a particular part of the process; and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).