Sherrie Lynn Zukle v. The Regents of the University of California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that Title II of the ADA was expressly modeled after § 504 of the RA, and that there is “no significant difference in analysis of the rights and obligations created by the ADA and the [RA] ”
• noting that courts may analyze 8 discrimination claims under the ADA and the Rehab Act together, as there is no 9 significant difference between the analysis of rights and obligations created by each Act
• observing that Title II of the ADA was expressly modeled after § 504 of the 11 RA, and that there is “no significant difference in analysis of the rights and obligations created by 12 the ADA and the [RA]”
• describing the ADA and Rehabilitation Act as creating the same rights and obligations and that cases interpreting either are applicable and interchangeable
• noting “[t]here is no 13 significant difference in analysis of the rights and obligations created by the ADA and the [RA]”
• rearranging medical clerkship rotations, reducing clinical 4 hours, and otherwise decelerating schedule would lower medical school’s 5 standards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).