Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Darrone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 1978 Amendments to the Act were intended to codify the regulations enforcing § 504
• noting that “[ajmong [the Rehabilitation Act’s] purposes are ‘to promote and expand employment opportunities in the public and private sectors for handicapped individuals and place such individuals in employment.’ ”
• agreeing that law on available remedies for section 504 violations is “murky question”
• stating that a majority of the Court, in Guardians Ass’n v. Civil Service Commission of New York, 463 U.S. 582, 103 S.Ct. 3221, 77 L.Ed.2d 866 (1983
• recognizing that Rehabilitation Act has “remedial purpose”
• recognizing that Rehabilitation Act has \remedial purpose\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).