Alex C. Glaros v. Richard Perse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the conspiracy theory of personal jurisdiction requires that \the out-of-state co-conspirator was or should have been aware\ of the acts performed in the forum state in furtherance of the conspiracy
• holding that “general allegations of cooperation between private individuals and unspecified government agencies do not . . . make out a claim of action taken under color of state law”
• finding that not enough was said about the conduct of the defendants to demonstrate that defendants violated plaintiffs constitutional rights
• affirming dismissal of a Section 1983 claim against “defendant private individuals” where plaintiff relied on “conclusory statements that all defendants acted under color of law”
• “[Plaintiffs] allegations of conspiracy were purely conclusory and did not specifically link the out-of-state ... defendants to acts committed within Massachusetts.”
• “[G]eneral allegations of cooperation between private individuals and [ ] government agencies do not ... make out a claim of action taken under color of state law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).