Berlin Democratic Club v. Rumsfeld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering an alleged violation of the Sixth Amendment due to \electronic surveillance of conversations between his attorney and a consultant\
• considering an alleged violation of the Sixth Amendment due to “electronic surveillance of conversations between his attorney and a consultant”
• claim justiciable when infiltrators disrupted private organization by providing it with false information and soliciting illegal actions
• “Rule 41(a) cannot limit or restrict the dictates of the Constitution to the United States, however, particularly when the Supreme Court has held those dictates applicable overseas.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).