Richard Dewey v. The University of New Hampshire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting it would be “improper to posit a quantitative threshold above 5 which statistical evidence of disparate . . . impact is sufficient as a matter of law to infer 6 discriminatory intent”
• A “claim [must] at least set forth minimal facts, not subjective characterizations, as to who did what to whom and why.”
• it is “not enough to allege a general scenario which could be dominated by unpleaded facts”
• A “claim [must] at least set forth minimal facts, not subjective characterizations, as to who did what to whom and why.”
• warning § 1983 is subject to potential \misuse\ by plaintiffs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).