Albritton v. Cagle's, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that consent forms filed in a purported collective action did not carry over to new actions filed later
• “[W]Je must interpret [the scope of] consent forms according to the plain meaning of their language.”
• “[Section] 216(b) plainly states that [a collective] action may not proceed as to any person until a formal written consent from that person is filed in court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).