Skip to main content
· 11/5/2003

Prickett v. DeKalb County

Citations

  • 349 F.3d 1294
  • 9 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 129
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 22709
  • 2003 WL 22496805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Congress’ purpose in authorizing 216(b) class actions was to avoid multiple lawsuits where numerous employees have allegedly been harmed by a claimed viola- or violations of the FLSA by a particemployer.”
  • “Congress’ purpose in authorizing § 216(b) class actions was to avoid multiple lawsuits where numerous employees have allegedly been harmed by a claimed violation or violations of the FLSA by a particular employer.”
  • “[B]y referring to them as ‘party plaintiff[s]’ Congress indicated that opt-in plaintiffs should have the same status in No. 20-5947 Canaday v. The Anthem Companies, Inc. Page 31 relation to the claims of the lawsuit as do the named plaintiffs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Carnes, Barkett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.