Albios v. Horizon Communities, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff in a constructional defect case was not entitled to attorney fees, despite statute authorizing fees awards in such cases, if he or she rejected an offer of judgment more favorable than the verdict obtained
• holding that plaintiff in a constructional defect case was not entitled to attorney fees, despite statute authorizing fees awards in such cases, if he or she rejected an offer of judgment more favorable than the verdict obtained
• noting that a district court may only award attorney fees pursuant to a statute, rule, or contract
• explaining that SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) l947A .411Rv the district court generally may not award attorney fees absent authority under a statute, rule, or contract
• explaining that an offer excluding \attorney fees and costs . . . was insufficient to alert the [offerees] to the fact that prejudgment interest would also be excluded\ and adding prejudgment interest into the NRCP 68(g) comparison as a result
• explaining that an offer excluding \attorney fees and costs . . . was insufficient to alert the [offerees] to the fact that prejudgment interest would also be excluded\ and adding prejudgment interest into the NRCP 68(g) comparison as a result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).