Skip to main content
· 8/31/1983

Beattie v. Thomas

Citations

  • 668 P.2d 268
  • 99 Nev. 579
  • 1983 Nev. LEXIS 507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a district court abuses its discretion if it awards the full amount of attorney fees requested without making \findings based on evidence that the attorney's fees sought are reasonable and justified\
  • concluding that a district court abuses its discretion if it awards the full amount of attorney fees requested without making \findings based on evidence that the attorney's fees sought are reasonable and justified\
  • holding that the district court did not err by refusing to give appellant’s proffered instruction, which deviated from the traditional view that “the physician’s duty to disclose is measured by a professional medical standard, which the plaintiff must establish with expert testimony”
  • holding that jury instructions \must be consistent with existing law\
  • holding that jury instructions \must be consistent with existing law\
  • noting that it is an abuse of discretion to award the full amount of requested attorney fees without making “findings based on evidence that the attorney’s fees sought are reasonable and justified”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mowbray, Manoukian, Springer, Steffen, Gunderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.